Skip to content
Global 100 Forum

Do you have to disclose AI-generated content, and who requires labels?

Staff answerWritten by Tomas Reyes · 1 reply · updated

Short answer

Increasingly yes, depending on where you publish and what the content is. The EU AI Act makes disclosure of deepfakes a legal obligation, YouTube and TikTok require labels on realistic AI media, Meta labels on detection or self-disclosure, and the US FTC treats AI-driven impersonation as fraud under existing rules. Plain text is the least regulated.

CiteGlobal 100 Forum, "Do you have to disclose AI-generated content, and who requires labels?", https://forum.global100.org/q/do-you-have-to-disclose-ai-generated-content-and-who-requires-labels/, accessed 2026-10-11.
Written by Tomas Reyes · Edits the deepfakes and provenance sections ·
  1. Edits the deepfakes and provenance sections ·

    The legal baseline: EU AI Act Article 50

    Article 50 of the EU AI Act is the only broad, binding labelling law in a major market, applying from 2 August 2026 under Article 113. It stacks four duties: chatbots must make clear the user is dealing with an AI; providers of systems generating synthetic audio, image, video or text must mark outputs in a machine-readable, detectable way where technically feasible; deployers who create deepfakes must disclose it, with a lighter duty for evidently artistic or satirical work; and AI text published to inform the public on matters of public interest must be disclosed unless a person holds editorial responsibility for it.

    The Commission's Digital Omnibus text gives systems on the market before 2 August 2026 until 2 December 2026 to meet the marking duty.

    Platform rules: YouTube, TikTok and Meta

    YouTube requires creators to disclose, via the "AI use" setting in YouTube Studio, content that makes a real person appear to say or do something they did not, alters footage of a real event, or generates a realistic scene that never happened. Unrealistic content and minor edits (filters, AI-written scripts, cloning your own voice) need no disclosure. YouTube may label content itself when it carries C2PA metadata, and that label cannot be removed; persistent non-disclosure risks removal or Partner Program suspension.

    TikTok requires labels on all realistic AI-generated images, audio or video, auto-labels content carrying C2PA Content Credentials, and does not let creators remove an auto-label. Some AI content is banned regardless: fake crisis events, fake authoritative sources, and the likeness of under-18s or private adults without permission.

    Meta's April 2024 policy post chose labels over removal: Facebook, Instagram and Threads apply an "AI info" label on detecting industry-standard AI indicators or on self-disclosure, from May 2024 for organic content. Political and social issue advertisers have had to disclose digital alteration in certain cases since January 2024.

    The United States: no label law, but deception rules apply

    No general US law requires AI labels; the tool is enforcement against deception. In February 2024 the Federal Trade Commission finalised its rule on government and business impersonation and proposed extending it to individuals, citing voice cloning and deepfakes. Undisclosed AI is not itself illegal there; using it to impersonate a real person or company is.

    C2PA: the label that travels with the file

    C2PA publishes an open standard, Content Credentials, recording a file's origin and edits in signed metadata; its steering committee includes Adobe, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI and TikTok, and it is the obvious route to the marking Article 50 demands. Its limits are in the C2PA thread: the data is optional and stripped by screenshots. Text has no container for it and relies on watermarking instead.

    Who requires AI labels, on what, and since when

    Who requires it What must be labelled From when
    EU AI Act, Article 50 Chatbots, machine-readable marks on synthetic output, deepfakes, public-interest AI text 2 August 2026; marking grace to 2 December 2026 for existing systems
    YouTube Realistic content altering real people, events or places, or inventing scenes In force; C2PA auto-labels cannot be removed
    TikTok All realistic AI-generated images, audio and video; some banned outright In force; C2PA auto-labels cannot be removed
    Meta Content with industry AI indicators or self-disclosed; altered political ads May 2024; political ads January 2024
    US FTC No label duty; impersonation of government, business and (proposed) individuals is actionable February 2024
    C2PA Content Credentials Voluntary provenance metadata from tools and cameras Open standard; read by YouTube and TikTok

    What that means in practice

    • Realistic is the trigger. A fantasy scene needs no label; a real-looking person or event does.
    • Decide before upload. If the file carries C2PA data, YouTube and TikTok will label it, permanently.
    • Text is the gap. Only the EU rule touches AI text, and only for public-interest publishing.
    • Disclosure does not launder deception. A label does not make a fake endorsement lawful.
    0
    ReplyLink

1 more reply

Most helpful first
  1. Tomas ReyesStaffEdits the deepfakes and provenance sections ·

    A workflow point for anyone publishing AI-assisted media regularly: export with provenance intact rather than screenshotting the result, and decide up front whether you want the platform's automatic label or would rather self-disclose in your own words. The two are not equivalent. An auto-label from C2PA data is locked; a self-disclosure can be edited and can carry context such as "voice cloned from my own recording". For work heading to EU audiences after August 2026, keeping the machine-readable mark on the file is also the simplest way to show the Article 50 duty was met.

Write a reply

Plain text or simple Markdown. Links are nofollow. Your email is never shown.